Freddie Ljungberg: A “colorful” player whose influence is still felt

With his pink hair and clothing demonstrating, Freddie Ljungberg was Arsenal’s David Beckham. There weren’t many like him in the mid 2000s.

It’s difficult to distinguish the exact minute when showiness wound up typical in the Premier League.

Rewind to 2008, and Arsenal’s Nicklas Bendtner was making national paper features for wearing pink boots — a choice that was broadly criticized.

“I adore my pink boots,” the striker enthused. “I’ve needed to play in that shading since I was youthful [and] I don’t figure anybody can rival me now.”

Ten years before that, it was hard to discover a player wearing any shading on their feet other than dark. It isn’t so much that the association wasn’t loaded with enormous identities, however the degree to which players showed their ostentatiousness was progressively constrained.

Eric Cantona — ostensibly the greatest character of the early Premier League time — demonstrated his uniqueness by popping his neckline. David Beckham was the special case, uncovering each new hair style with exact planning.

Check out today, and obviously the dam has blasted.

Players change hairdos constantly, while it’s elusive a sans tattoo lower arm in the game. Dark boots have turned into the special case and highlighter shades the standard.

Indeed, even vanilla footballers like Sergio Aguero are fading their hair. Be that as it may, this is no Garth Crooks rage: it really is great. It’s enjoyable. Long may masterful hair styles proceed.


In light of hair styles, however, it merits recalling how another Arsenal Scandinavian — one undeniably more mainstream than the pink-shoed Bendtner — parted from the stylish repetitiveness of the late 2000s and turned into a faction saint in doing as such.

That player was Freddie Ljungberg, a Swedish midfielder who won two Premier League titles and three FA Cups more than nine years with Arsenal.

Marked in 1998 for a deal £3million, Ljungberg was a tasteful player fit for scoring splendid objectives. Essentially, be that as it may, he likewise had pinkish-red hair.

At the point when Arsenal beat Chelsea 2-0 to verify the FA Cup in 2002, it was Ljungberg who stole the show. The Swede’s 25-yard strike fixed the success in the 80th moment, acquiring him the Man of the Match grant.

In any case, it wasn’t only his ability for such objectives that had made him an Arsenal clique legend. All around the Millennium Stadium that day, one could see Gunners fans with pink stripes in their hair, paying praise to their most unmistakable star.

Ljungberg was great, yet he was additionally outwardly notable.

Concentrating on Ljungberg’s looks may appear to damn with black out applause, yet it truly isn’t. He was a decent player, loaded with vitality, favored with system, and he scored an objective each four recreations — a superior rate than Bendtner’s, for what it’s value.

He additionally turned out for Arsenal amid the trophy-rich first 50% of the Wenger time frame, having an essential impact in those victories.

Be that as it may, you can discover all that on YouTube and Wikipedia.

Additionally, it’s no embellishment — or fundamentally a terrible thing — to state that his cushioned red mane had to a greater extent a social effect on the Premier League than his objectives.

Related soul

In being known for his appearance, Ljungberg is, obviously, a ton like Beckham.

While no one needs helping to remember Beckham’s capacity, it’s verifiable that the Englishman’s superstar persona and style changed the manner in which we see footballers — and changed the frames of mind of footballers themselves.

Ljungberg was Arsenal’s Beckham: an attractive midfielder with colored hair who likewise demonstrated clothing as a side gig. The main genuine distinction between them? Ljungberg’s hair in the end dropped out.

Obviously, having pink hair is definitely not a critical thing when you come football down to its objectives, toss ins, alliance tables what not. Be that as it may, football is a culture as much as a game, and in the mid 2000s Ljungberg turned into a social symbol as much as a brandishing one.

Like Beckham, the Swede demonstrated how Premier League footballers can utilize their situation to overwhelm distinctive segments of the social circle.

Having his impact as a lightweight Renaissance man, the midfielder could wear his Dreamcast unit one moment and strip down to Calvin Klein pants the following, every action adding to his distinction and fortune.


Some would contend this is certainly not a completely beneficial thing.

Those in the Crooks-Souness camp, for instance, are quick to censure any semblance of Paul Pogba for preparing whimsies, recommending — with only a bit of rationale — that thinking about looks implies you can’t think completely about football.

You could likewise call attention to that few out of every odd player (or fan) can pull off such showiness. Ljungberg was ridiculous attractive; somebody like Martin Keown, less attractive, would not have picked up a similar religion following for kicking the bucket his hair.

Toward the day’s end, notwithstanding, Ljungberg adding to the unwinding of tasteful standards must be gainful in the long haul.

Since it’s not difficult to work out why there was — and still is — such shame around a thing like pink boots. Or then again why a chap with features and white boots would have gotten an amazing kicking in a Sunday group coordinate in the mid 2000s.

Truth be told, Ljungberg was frequently subject to homophobic insults all through his vocation in the top flight, continually getting over it with affableness.

The Arsenal legend may have quite recently been somewhat vain, however his showiness proceeds, unusually, to separate partialities. What’s more, who saw that coming?

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.